Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

In Pursuit of Peace in the Middle East



"The Framework for Peace in the Middle East and the Framework for the Conclusion of a Peace Treaty Between Egypt and Israel were two major steps forward. For a few hours, all three of us were flushed with pride and good will toward one another because of our unexpected success. We had no idea at that time how far we still had to go."

Jimmy Carter
Keeping Faith (1982)

It is probably not an exaggeration to say that the presidency of Jimmy Carter endured more bad days than good.

But today is the 35th anniversary of one of the good ones — maybe the best one — for it was on this day in 1978 that Carter, Israel's Menachem Begin and Egypt's Anwar Sadat signed the Camp David Accords.

Those accords led to a peace treaty the following year — the first such treaty ever signed by the still–new nation of Israel with any of its Arab neighbors in the Middle East — and a shared Nobel Peace Prize for Begin and Sadat.

Secretly, the three men had been engaged in nearly two weeks of negotiations at Camp David, Md., the presidential retreat. Their mutual suspicions required Carter to negotiate with each one separately, going from one cabin to another. At one point, I have heard, he even took the two men to nearby Gettysburg in the hope that they would be inspired by the story of America's civil war.

At the time the accords were signed, it seemed to the general public that the negotiations at Camp David were virtually spontaneous, but appearances can be deceiving. In truth, the Camp David Accords were the outcome of more than a year's worth of diplomatic discussions between the three countries that began after Carter became president in 1977.

What was unique was the fact that Carter managed to bring the two leaders to the same place at the same time.

But even that wasn't enough to ensure the success of the negotiations.

It required a lot of hard, behind–the–scenes work. The two nations had a brief but stormy history that aroused great passion on both sides — and erected often–enormous barriers between them.

Since Israel was established in 1948, there had been three armed conflicts between Egypt and Israel by the time of the Camp David Accords. Israel won them all and, as a result of the 1967 war, controlled the Sinai Peninsula that connects Africa and Asia.

But Sadat, who probably deserves more credit for the Camp David Accords than he received, traveled to Jerusalem in late 1977 to speak to Israel's parliament, the Knesset. Less than a year later, he joined Carter and Begin at the presidential retreat.

At the time of the accords, Sadat was widely praised outside the Arab world — within it, though, he was roundly condemned. Three years later, on the eighth anniversary of the Yom Kippur war, Sadat was assassinated by Muslim extremists while he watched a military parade in Cairo.

The peace process continued.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

International Tensions

A friend of mine sent me an intriguing e-mail today.

Her subject line said, "Israel and Iran," and her message said, simply, "Looking like they are on the verge of war."

What could I say? Iran test fired some missiles near the Strait of Hormuz, "a narrow strip of water through which much of the world's oil supply passes," writes Tom Baldwin in the London Times.

That news is disturbing, all right.

But what is really disturbing to me is how people in this country — or at least those in my corner of it — perceive Iran's activities to be routine.

Just another day at the office — to apply a Western concept to that part of the world.

There's tension in the Middle East, people seem to be saying. What else is new? Jesse Jackson made some disparaging remarks about Barack Obama. DNA tests cleared JonBenet Ramsey's family of her murder a dozen years ago. Did gas prices go up again today?

Actually, anything that happens in the Middle East has the potential to affect gas prices here.

And Iran seems bound and determined to increase the tension in the Middle East at any time. "Our finger is always on the trigger," said Iran's commander of the Revolutionary Guard.

But, back here, in the United States of America, the top news stories today are:

  1. Jesse Jackson apologizes for making a "crude" remark about Barack Obama near an open microphone.

    (It seems to me that, if Obama doesn't lose this election, it won't be because his "friends" didn't try hard enough.)

  2. Obama joined 68 other senators in supporting broader government spying powers and immunity for phone companies that assist in secret wiretapping.

  3. DNA evidence exonerates JonBenet Ramsey's family nearly 12 years after her murder.

  4. The number of salmonella victims passes 1,000.

  5. The lawyers for model Christie Brinkley and architect Peter Cook are going at it in a very public divorce case.

  6. Sen. Edward Kennedy returns to the Senate to cast his vote to break a Republican filibuster of a Medicare bill.

  7. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost more than 235 points today, falling to a two-year low.

  8. A comic book character that has been popular in Mexico for 60 years is being called a racist caricature.

  9. The discovery of a few ticks on an airplane delayed a flight from Des Moines, Iowa, to Denver for nearly six hours.

  10. Two members of Colombia's rebel group FARC were offered money to switch sides and deliver false messages as part of last week's hostage rescue.

Now, most of these news stories are important — to a degree.

But Iran, with today's test firings, its hatred for Israel and its nuclear ambitions, trumps them all, in my opinion.

Yet it's getting the least attention.

This is the kind of thing that requires some presidential leadership. I haven't seen any leadership from the current occupant of the Oval Office. I guess he's leaving it to the next president to deal with the increasingly messy situation in the Middle East.

What are we getting from his would-be successors?

Well, John McCain is criticizing Obama for "failing to declare the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist group," writes Michael Shear in the Washington Post.

I haven't heard anything from Obama. Maybe he was too busy voting to give Big Brother the biggest overhaul in federal surveillance law in three decades.

In the past, Obama has been opposed to giving immunity to phone companies. Now that he's the Democrats' presumptive nominee, his philosophy appears to be changing as he tries to look like a centrist.

McCain, apparently, was too busy campaigning to show up to vote. In the past, he has supported the immunity plan.

For the record, Hillary Clinton voted against the bill.