The horse race for the Democratic nomination is shaping up to be a photo finish.
But neither horse may have what it takes to make it to the finish line.
Even after you factor in all the super-delegates and the delegates that were committed to each candidate based on the popular vote in each state -- and you allow for the delegates that are left in the primaries that haven't been held yet -- the numbers don't add up to a majority for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
And that means revisiting Michigan and Florida, which held Democratic primaries on dates that violated party rules. Consequently, their delegations were barred from the convention in Denver this summer.
But now it appears that no one can be nominated for president, under the party's existing rules, without those delegations. Unless the party wants to break -- or rewrite -- a bunch of rules.
Party chairman Howard Dean told CBS' Face the Nation he thought it was "very unlikely" that the Michigan and Florida delegations would be seated at the convention without some concessions on both sides.
Dean also said that the party would not pay to hold "do-over" primaries in both states.
"[O]ur job is to tell the American people about Senator McCain's record on Iraq and the deficits and so forth, and convince the American people that our nominee is better than Senator McCain," Dean said. "And that's what we're going to be using our resources for."
Well, that's fine, Mr. Chairman, but you haven't got a nominee yet. And, like it or not, there are some differences between Clinton and Obama. Right now, the choice is between McCain and a shadow candidate, Sen. Generic Democrat. McCain will have the opportunity to sharpen his attacks once he can stop referring to the nominee as "my opponent" all the time.
It may not be what the Democrats wanted, but something will have to be done about Michigan and Florida.
Part of this mathematical quandary could be resolved fairly simply, it seems to me. If the delegations from Michigan and Florida aren't being included in the decision, why are their numbers still included in the total? Doesn't that artificially inflate the majority number a candidate needs to win the nomination?
Florida originally was allocated 210 delegates. Michigan originally received 156 delegates. Based on the original delegate totals, a candidate needs 2,024 delegates to be nominated (currently, Obama has 1,527 and Clinton has 1,428).
If you take away the delegations from Michigan and Florida, a candidate needs less than 1,850 to win the nomination.
If you adjust the math, it's still a tight race, but, with the bar lowered appropriately, it doesn't mean that Obama or Clinton must win four-fifths of the vote in every primary that's left in order to be nominated.
Joy
2 hours ago
3 comments:
Actually, the number for nomination was lowered because of Michigan and Florida; I forgot where I saw it, but it was in a news story somewhere last week. Thus, if you add them back in, you'd need to adjust the total upwards, which still means the same thing -- not enough delegates to win the nomination. What a mess. Only the democrats can find such unique ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory...
I stand corrected.
Thanks.
An update here.
According to the latest information I've seen, the old finish-line number for nomination hasn't changed.
The delegates from Michigan and Florida apparently are still being included in the total, but no delegates from either state will be allowed to vote.
So these "phantom" delegates will keep the number needed for the nomination artificially high.
Post a Comment