David Gibson, the religion reporter for Politics Daily, wrote last month that, according to the FBI, "the number of reported hate crimes dropped significantly in 2009 from the previous year, to their lowest point in more than 15 years."
This happened, Gibson observed, "despite the deepening recession and growing social tensions."
And that's a good thing — if you can verify that hate–inspired crimes actually did drop, but that isn't as easy to verify as you might think.
I'll grant you that sometimes it's obvious — like that case a dozen years or so ago when the black man was dragged to his death by a group of white men in a pickup truck.
Sometimes it's a matter of suspicion. You may think that a crime was motivated by hate because the victim(s) belonged to a particular race or religion or gender — but suspicion alone is not sufficient to charge anyone with a crime, whatever the motivation.
I would argue that, at least to a degree, all crimes are hate crimes so I'm not sure how I feel about the special designation in the criminal code for hate crimes.
I understand what lawmakers are trying to do, but it seems to me that it is an invitation for the implementation of George Orwell's Thought Police — and I really don't believe that is what anyone really wants in America.
The laws already regulate — as much as is possible — the actions of the citizens. Do we also want to regulate the people's thoughts?
Gibson reports that the faithful are hailing the news, which is to be expected, I guess, in this season of love and hope and joy.
"[R]eligious groups are giving thanks for the decline," Gibson writes, "even if they have no clear explanations for the drop."
I guess no explanations are needed — except, perhaps, in Room 101.
Matt Gaetz Withdraws Name From AG Consideration
38 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment