In an editorial headlined "Obama's Dry Hole," the Wall Street Journal dismisses Barack Obama's argument that the oil companies have been stockpiling leases on federal lands to manipulate gas prices.
Obama alleges that "68 million acres that have the potential to nearly double America's total oil production" have gone untouched.
"[T[he notion is obviously false — at least to anyone who knows how oil and gas exploration actually works," the Wall Street Journal says.
Then it applauds "liberals" for "finally acknowledging the significance of supply and demand."
I don't know if the Wall Street Journal is just noticing this (as many on the right seem likely to act these days), but the law of supply and demand isn't being "finally" acknowledged.
It is one of many factors that thoughtful progressives see as important (along with the need for conservation, the sense of urgency for finding reliable and renewable sources of energy and other factors) in the energy debate.
But "supply and demand" seems to enter the conversation these days (on both sides) with the accompanying question about "Big Oil" and its alleged role in all this.
Well, if you're going to insist on pointing your finger at someone ...
Newsweek's Robert Samuelson suggests a new culprit — the speculators.
"A chorus of politicians, including John McCain, Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Lieberman, blames these financial slimeballs for piling into commodities markets and pushing prices to artificial and unconscionable levels," Samuelson writes.
"Gosh, if only it were that simple," he continues. "Speculator-bashing is another exercise in scapegoating and grandstanding. Leading politicians either don't understand what's happening or don't want to acknowledge their complicity."
All the proposals I've heard for dealing with today's energy crisis seem to be based on the belief that there is a quick-fix solution out there to the reality of a finite supply of fossil fuels.
Whether the proposal is for a windfall profits tax (the logic behind the tax suggests that big oil is manipulating supply to inflate price, but such a tax is likely to restrict production and produce much less revenue than predicted) or a summer "tax holiday" (which would provide minimal — and temporary — financial aid to the consumer — while forcing state governments to cut their workforce — along with some important road maintenance projects), none of the "solutions" I've heard address the real issue of long-term energy needs — including independence from foreign energy suppliers.
So I guess, as Samuelson writes, the speculators are next on the blame list.
Isn't it time for our politicians to speak in depth about a long-term answer? I don't expect anyone to have the answer. How do we find it? That's the kind of vision we seek from our leaders.
We need a strategy.
Comparative Incumbencies
46 minutes ago
1 comment:
Imagine the WSJ pointing the finger away from big business. No agenda there...
I read the same article, and noticed the lack of any data supporting their claims. The fact is that there is more untapped oil on fed land being leased by oil companies, which totally washes away their argument we need new drilling platforms in the ocean or drilling in ANWR. One can't cry for more milk when it is sitting in front of them.
Regardless, you are correct that there is no quick fix solution. The profits are obscene, and on the backs of everyone else. Many people don't have a choice but to drive to work -- and most of these cannot afford the gas anymore. But they HAVE to drive to work. A terrible Catch-22. So, taxing these profits is a first step.
Next, we should support rail development like we have supported highway and road development. The only way "Big Oil" and the "Big 3" carmakers ever made it in the first place was HUGE government subsidies to build the roads we all enjoy now and search and drill for oil. Unfortunately, that came at the expense of rail. At the turn of the 19th-20th century, the US had the most extensive rail system in the world. That is in shambles now and will be far more expensive to resurrect, but it is something we have to do.
Step 3 is for all of us to look deep inside and change our lifestyles. We have to not only buy locally, but demand local products; we need to help local farmers and not huge conglomerate farming as this cuts down significantly on transportation to our local stores. We have to limit our trips in cars as much as possible. We have to realize that taking the bus will be far more time-consuming than driving our own cars, and much less convenient. But you can read a book or talk on the cell safely from a bus.
There is no quick fix, but the oil companies do have us over a barrel as they have enjoyed the benefit of government subsidy for about a century. That needs to change.
And it doesn't stop with them; as Gandhi said "Be the change you want to see." That is the only way this ball ever gets rolling.
Post a Comment