If you're looking for insightful analyses on the races for the presidency, the Senate and the House, you can't go wrong if you consult Larry Sabato, the director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics.
Today, he's provided us with an update on the races for the Senate.
Party control of the Senate, he observes, has changed hands six times since 1980. "This is no longer a rare event."
Sabato has come to the conclusion that "2008 is virtually certain not to generate a seventh such shift."
As I've mentioned before, a big part of the reason is that these senators were elected in 2002. It was the midterm of George W. Bush's first term as president. Normally, midterms go against the party that occupies the White House, but the country was only a year removed from the 9-11 attacks and Bush was pressing for the authority to go to war in Iraq.
So the Republicans won a lot of seats in the Senate. And, as a result, they have twice as many seats to defend as the Democrats do in this election cycle -- when gas prices have risen about 36% in a year, the war is unpopular, and Bush is a lame duck.
All the Democrats are seeking re-election and only one, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, appears to be in a close race. Most observers, Sabato included, believe Democrats will retain at least 11 of their 12 seats.
The Republicans have to defend more than 20 seats, and a handful of their senators are retiring (including Larry Craig of Idaho, Pete Domenici of New Mexico and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska).
Due to the death of one senator and the retirement of another who was not scheduled to be up for re-election this year, Republicans have to defend two more seats -- in Wyoming and Mississippi, where the voters will be electing two senators at the same time.
Sabato says Wyoming Republicans should be able to hold both their seats, but the seat formerly held by Trent Lott in Mississippi is currently a tossup.
In Mississippi, Gov. Haley Barbour appointed Rep. Roger Wicker to succeed Lott. Sabato says Wicker has a "50-50 chance" of holding the seat for the Republicans in November.
In assessing the 11 most competitive Senate races this year, Sabato concludes that Democrats will pick up four seats and two seats currently held by Republicans are tossups (Alaska and Lott's old seat in Mississippi). Thus, a six-seat gain is possible for the Democrats.
In Alaska, longtime Sen. Ted Stevens "is mired in a major corporate scandal involving pay-offs and bribery," writes Sabato. But "[h]e has not been indicted and may be able to clear himself."
And, as Sabato observes, "it is too early to call any November election for an Alaska Democrat."
None of the Democratic seats are currently likely to shift to the Republicans, according to Sabato, not even Landrieu's seat.
Louisiana lost a lot of Democratic votes when a large number of blacks had to leave New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, Sabato points out, but he concludes that the state is leaning to Landrieu. "This might be a tight race in the end, but it isn't starting that way."
It's not all bad news for Republicans, according to Sabato. They might not be picking up any seats, but there are a few they may be likely to hold, even if it turns out to be a Democratic year.
In Minnesota, the home of Hubert Humphrey and Walter Mondale, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman "is beatable," Sabato writes, "but it is uncertain whether the new convention-crowned Democratic nominee, comedian Al Franken, can do it.
"Franken has been found to have had a substantial number of overdue tax bills in various states, and some of his off-color satires from past years have not sold well in this more politically correct era."
Franken might still have a struggle on his hands if former Gov. Jesse Ventura opts to run as an independent -- a move he's been mulling lately.
Ventura won't win the Senate seat, Sabato says, "but he's the ultimate wild card."
Comparative Incumbencies
47 minutes ago
3 comments:
Ventura won't win? What an idiot. This time Jesse isn't gonna allow it to be close
Just so it's clear to everyone.
Whenever I put something in quotation marks, it means I'm quoting something that someone else wrote or said.
In this post, I was quoting Larry Sabato.
I have no personal opinion at this point about anything that will happen in the Minnesota Senate race. Or, for that matter, what Ventura will do.
The point is not that Ventura will win, rather what will his effect be in the race. For instance, Nader had an incredible effect in 2000 and some in 2004 while garnering less than 5% of the vote.
Here in Georgia, we could have such an effect on the presidential race. Libertarian candidate Bob Barr is a popular Georgia conservative. He has no chance of winning the presidency, but it is expected he will syphon off votes from McCain, whom conservatives everywhere are not excited about. I don't think Barr will have such an effect in other states, but here, it could be critical. And if Obama were to take Georgia because of it ... well the GOP finally will know how we all feel about Nader: many of us put some of the blame on him for the past 8 years of ineptitude (lots of blame to go around though: Jeb and Kathy Harris, Supreme Court and a horrible Gore campaign).
I didn't know Jesse was planning on running, but I would bet it will influence the outcome even if he doesn't win.
Post a Comment